Skip to main content

Is Spotify (And subscription-based streaming music) doomed?

As Apple gets set to wade into the "streaming" waters of on-demand, subscription-based music, a spotlight (or spotify-light?) is put squarely on the industry.

It may end up that we are currently living in a small epoch where for $10/month you could access basically any music you wanted, to stream or download.  Spotify currently leads the way with 15 million such accounts.  They have a reported 60 million users overall, with the balance being users who use the free, ad-based version.

A service that boasts 60 million users and 15 million paid users should be considered a success. Unfortunately, that is not the case.  Spotify recently announced additional services to their platform, from video content to podcasts.  I originally felt that podcasts being added to Spotify was a great thing, a validation that the medium had made it.  To have another major platform to vie alongside Apple would only help them reach more people.

But, the news coming out of the announcement was that video and podcasts were added because streaming music is not paying the bills, forget making a profit.

A music service with that many users, and the very reason the service exists - THE MUSIC - is not enough?

Video and spoken word audio is supposed to help it find financial solvency?

Podcasts, which haven't exactly found a way to make anyone rich in and of themselves, are supposed to be the answer?

The Verge wrote:

Spotify's finances make clear where the anxiety over free music stems from. The average revenue it earns per user in the free, ad-supported tier has been falling dramatically, from around 40 cents per month in 2012 to 26 cents per month in 2014. As a percentage of overall revenue advertising now makes up just 9 percent, down from 13 percent in 2012. Yet these subscribers make up three-quarters of the 60 million people that use Spotify every month. 
One thing is clear: despite its impressive growth, Spotify is still struggling to turn a profit. It represent over half the dollars flowing into streaming music, according to (Spotify CEO Daniel) Ek. But while its overall revenues have more than doubled since 2012, so have its losses. In its most recent financial disclosure, the company revealed that it lost $165 million, up 65 percent from one year earlier. That's because around 80 percent of its revenues flow out the door to rights holders, namely the major labels. Today's announcement was a play to escape the onerous economics of a pure play digital music service and become a more broad-based streaming media platform.
On top of this, I am convinced that the majority of people are casual music listeners, listening to free radio or streaming services, like Pandora or Spotify's free-tier, or to the libraries they have accrued over the years.  To put forth money on a regular basis, it is for cherished albums or must-have singles.  We may find that $10/month (affordable as it may feel to access everything) is simply too rich for most people's blood, especially when you stretch it out to $120/year.  In other words, the potential to get millions and millions more paid subscribers might not be there.

And what about the legion of people - like myself with Google Music All Access - who have been paying?

Can you imagine if the economics ultimately do in the viability of all-you-can-eat, subscription-based streaming music?  What if you were a Spotify, Rdio, Apple, Google Music All Access, or whatever subscriber for several years?  All the sudden maybe you paid out $400-$500 to "rent" music for many years.  If the services go away today, you ultimately have nothing.  Even if you used half of that estimate to purchase albums and singles, you would at least have a piece (albeit digital) to move forward with and listen to.


Popular posts from this blog

Fethead vs. Cloudlifter & My Podcast Equipment

The Triton Audio Fethead and Cloudlifter are two preamp devices that come up a lot for podcasters searching for the best sound.

One reason is that many podcasters looking for a high-end microphone at a lower budget opt for the Shure SM7B, like me!  This is a great microphone, but has a very low base output (more on this later).  Another reason is that these preamp devices allow you to not go pedal-to-the-metal with your mixer or digital recorders' onboard preamps, which typically add a lot of noise the more you push to maximum.

I am no audio engineering expert, but in my zeal to launch the best podcast that I possibly can, I have learned a lot about how you create good sound and all the tricks that go into doing it at a somewhat modest price.

At heart, what the Fethead and Cloudlifter each do is add about 20-25 decibels of "clean gain" to your microphone's audio signal, before that signal even touches your mixer or digital recorder.  Again, they each add only pure, c…

Anthony Cumia has 40,000 Subscribers

This according to a new feature on Anthony Cumia - formerly of the Opie & Anthony Show - in Streaming Media Magazine and on  Cumia has a video and audio podcast available to subscribers through his Website,

The monthly subscription for the content service is $6.95.  By my own math, this means Cumia is bringing in about $278,000 per month, or roughly $3.3 million per year.

As a subscriber, you are offered discounts for locking in your subscription for six months ($32.95) or a year ($59.95).

That is not a bad living as your own boss.

There is no doubt that the workload is greater starting up his own endeavor and without the backing of a large radio conglomerate.  He apparently made about $3 million per year doing his SiriusXM radio show.

The revenue he is bringing in now must also go towards paying staff, ongoing infrastructure and hosting costs, and any promotional aspects he engages in.  Still, he does not leave his home and appears to be d…

Jane Gagliardo, Sherry Blackman, Patrick Reilly, Melany McQueeny

Jane Gagliardo, Sherry Blackman, and Patrick Reilly join Melany and Matt for a longform discussion on their riveting book, "Call to Witness: One woman’s battle with disability, discrimination and a pharmaceutical powerhouse."

Get Call to Witness on Amazon!

Jane Gagliardo was a throwaway employee, fired after working nearly a decade for this leading vaccine maker when her disability surfaced. Fearless and impassioned, her story will leave readers empowered to stand up for themselves, even if it means standing alone. This 2002 landmark case changed the law and challenges the way corporations do business today. This riveting dramatic account sheds fascinating insight into the world of vaccine production, both past and present, that will have every reader searching through their immunization record—this corporation literally runs in the veins of millions of Americans.
A portion of the proceeds from the book go to Multiple Sclerosis research.

Check out this episode!

Also find the…